Shop More Submit  Join Login
×
  • Art Print
  • Canvas
  • Photo
Download JPG 1700 × 2200




Details

Submitted on
October 12, 2011
Image Size
301 KB
Resolution
1700×2200
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
3,508
Favourites
59 (who?)
Comments
52
Downloads
79
×
Occupy Everwhere by Trudooms Occupy Everwhere by Trudooms
Occupy Poster in response to Occupy Wall Street.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconvelmenni:
velmenni Featured By Owner Jul 5, 2012  Student Traditional Artist
nonononononononono r u part of occupy wall street if you are that is so stupid you are stupid and a idiot
Reply
:iconceparker72:
ceparker72 Featured By Owner May 12, 2014  Student Digital Artist
Oh shut up.
Reply
:iconvelmenni:
velmenni Featured By Owner May 12, 2014  Student Traditional Artist
This is really old but whatever . Occupy Wallstreet is so stupid though . Ugh
Reply
:iconanarchist-threat:
Anarchist-Threat Featured By Owner Jun 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
The burgeoning Occupy Wall Street movement, and its slogan, “We are the 99%,” is drawing critical attention to the grossly unequal distribution of income and wealth in the U.S. Critiques include the injustice of the high incomes (and lack of incarceration) of Wall Street executives, given that their illegal actions caused the unemployment and homelessness of millions; the corrupting influence on the democratic process of the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few; and the basic indecency of the top 1 percent having much more than they could ever spend, while millions of Americans lack housing, health care, even food. Now, alot of you guys will say "The 1% are giving the poor their jobs, though, through an economical ''public bail-out'' if you will." That's untrue. People in more-equal societies live longer, a smaller proportion of children die in infancy, and self-rated health is better...for the people. Wellbeing of students, is equivalent as well as to that of the rich 1%. So, Im neither for or against it all, but I really think a balanced society would work. It's either Balanced, or None at all.
Reply
:iconhnbbtf:
HNBBTF Featured By Owner Apr 30, 2012
Reply
:iconluckyeater:
Luckyeater Featured By Owner Mar 18, 2012  Student Filmographer
Occupy wall street is retarded.
Reply
:iconshunshuu-tsunami:
Shunshuu-Tsunami Featured By Owner Mar 20, 2012
agreed
Reply
:iconluckyeater:
Luckyeater Featured By Owner Mar 20, 2012  Student Filmographer
Thank you.
Reply
:iconshunshuu-tsunami:
Shunshuu-Tsunami Featured By Owner Mar 20, 2012
no prob at all : D why do u think it's dumb?
Reply
:iconluckyeater:
Luckyeater Featured By Owner Mar 21, 2012  Student Filmographer
It's a pointless struggle to break the coexistance of the rich and poor. What OWS doesn't get is that without one, the other will not exist. If the job providing upperclass are over taxed, the poor can't get jobs to pay for their needs (and any wants, just as long as they are financally responsible). We all need eachother. Fighting about whom has the most money will not solve anything. The only thing we can do is just try to find a way to move foward. But OWS doesn't want to move foward, no. Not with rich people. We are moving backwards and everyone fighting with eachother are no more than catalysts.
Reply
Add a Comment: